<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 10,000 Pissed Off BlogRush Users</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ianfernando.com/2007/10000-pissed-off-blogrush-users/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ianfernando.com/2007/10000-pissed-off-blogrush-users/</link>
	<description>I Make Money Online by Simply Failing at It! Read my mistakes so you don\'t have to do them! A online blog of mistakes and successes.</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 11:33:56 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: BloggerDollar</title>
		<link>http://www.ianfernando.com/2007/10000-pissed-off-blogrush-users/#comment-2073</link>
		<dc:creator>BloggerDollar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 12:45:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ianfernando.com/2007/10000-pissed-off-blogrush-users/#comment-2073</guid>
		<description>I think that it was a necessary action. Blog Rush is a good idea with good design but no one actually clicking links. Actually I recently joined and my status was pending so I am still waiting for their decision. 
If they approve me they are the best if not go to hell :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that it was a necessary action. Blog Rush is a good idea with good design but no one actually clicking links. Actually I recently joined and my status was pending so I am still waiting for their decision.<br />
If they approve me they are the best if not go to hell <img src='http://www.ianfernando.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Echo Chamber Effect. &#124; Snoskred - Life in the Country</title>
		<link>http://www.ianfernando.com/2007/10000-pissed-off-blogrush-users/#comment-2030</link>
		<dc:creator>The Echo Chamber Effect. &#124; Snoskred - Life in the Country</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 13:58:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ianfernando.com/2007/10000-pissed-off-blogrush-users/#comment-2030</guid>
		<description>[...] 10,000 Pissed Off BlogRush Users [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 10,000 Pissed Off BlogRush Users [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Link Frenzy: BlogRush Related Articles - Untwisted Vortex</title>
		<link>http://www.ianfernando.com/2007/10000-pissed-off-blogrush-users/#comment-2005</link>
		<dc:creator>Link Frenzy: BlogRush Related Articles - Untwisted Vortex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 01:09:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ianfernando.com/2007/10000-pissed-off-blogrush-users/#comment-2005</guid>
		<description>[...] 10,000 Pissed Off BlogRush Users [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 10,000 Pissed Off BlogRush Users [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Local SEO Guide</title>
		<link>http://www.ianfernando.com/2007/10000-pissed-off-blogrush-users/#comment-2003</link>
		<dc:creator>Local SEO Guide</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2007 23:54:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ianfernando.com/2007/10000-pissed-off-blogrush-users/#comment-2003</guid>
		<description>No worries Simon!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No worries Simon!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon</title>
		<link>http://www.ianfernando.com/2007/10000-pissed-off-blogrush-users/#comment-2002</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2007 23:52:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ianfernando.com/2007/10000-pissed-off-blogrush-users/#comment-2002</guid>
		<description>Hey Andrew,

Sorry, didn't mean to sound as though I was levelling any criticism at you. I was just agreeing with a more general point (that from a dev's point of view, it gets frustrating if users don't read the instructions). I didn't mean to imply that you personally hadn't read them - there was nothing to read in this case.

I completely agree with you that the lack of warning before the 'cull' was hardly the best way to go about matters. Proof enough of that can be seen on the income.com blog, they had to close off the comments section.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Andrew,</p>
<p>Sorry, didn&#8217;t mean to sound as though I was levelling any criticism at you. I was just agreeing with a more general point (that from a dev&#8217;s point of view, it gets frustrating if users don&#8217;t read the instructions). I didn&#8217;t mean to imply that you personally hadn&#8217;t read them - there was nothing to read in this case.</p>
<p>I completely agree with you that the lack of warning before the &#8216;cull&#8217; was hardly the best way to go about matters. Proof enough of that can be seen on the income.com blog, they had to close off the comments section.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Local SEO Guide</title>
		<link>http://www.ianfernando.com/2007/10000-pissed-off-blogrush-users/#comment-2001</link>
		<dc:creator>Local SEO Guide</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2007 19:37:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ianfernando.com/2007/10000-pissed-off-blogrush-users/#comment-2001</guid>
		<description>Hey Joseph &#38; Simon,

As you can see on my blog I fully copped to the typo issue.  However you may feel about incompetent users, from my POV the big error here was how Blogrush communicated this info to me and other users like me.  If they had told me that was the issue up front I would have had no problem with them.  I still have no problem with them. I just wasn't crazy about the way they went about things.

Andrew</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Joseph &amp; Simon,</p>
<p>As you can see on my blog I fully copped to the typo issue.  However you may feel about incompetent users, from my POV the big error here was how Blogrush communicated this info to me and other users like me.  If they had told me that was the issue up front I would have had no problem with them.  I still have no problem with them. I just wasn&#8217;t crazy about the way they went about things.</p>
<p>Andrew</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BlogRush to (Bad) Judgment &#124; Word Sell, Inc.</title>
		<link>http://www.ianfernando.com/2007/10000-pissed-off-blogrush-users/#comment-2000</link>
		<dc:creator>BlogRush to (Bad) Judgment &#124; Word Sell, Inc.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2007 19:16:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ianfernando.com/2007/10000-pissed-off-blogrush-users/#comment-2000</guid>
		<description>[...] with thousands of other bloggers, I received a cold email from BlogRush the other day informing me that my blog [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] with thousands of other bloggers, I received a cold email from BlogRush the other day informing me that my blog [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon</title>
		<link>http://www.ianfernando.com/2007/10000-pissed-off-blogrush-users/#comment-1999</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2007 18:12:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ianfernando.com/2007/10000-pissed-off-blogrush-users/#comment-1999</guid>
		<description>You're right, it IS annoying when users blame the developer / company for their own error!

It may well be 6 of one, half a douzen of the other in this case. Did BlogRush screen blogs initially when they launched? If not, then I'd ask why not? If they did, then why didn't they catch splogs etc at that point?

I don't think anyone can argue with the fact that there must be some screening done to minimise spam showing up in the system, and that is going to be subjective to a degree (what is a splog?).

Maybe it wasn't so wise to announce on the income.com blog - we just got rid of 10,000 blogs. For all we know, 99.9% of those may well have been in the spam zone, but again, why was it all done in one go without warning, and why was there no clear policy from the beginning? 

Did they get a bit too wrapped up in their own hype initially?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re right, it IS annoying when users blame the developer / company for their own error!</p>
<p>It may well be 6 of one, half a douzen of the other in this case. Did BlogRush screen blogs initially when they launched? If not, then I&#8217;d ask why not? If they did, then why didn&#8217;t they catch splogs etc at that point?</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think anyone can argue with the fact that there must be some screening done to minimise spam showing up in the system, and that is going to be subjective to a degree (what is a splog?).</p>
<p>Maybe it wasn&#8217;t so wise to announce on the income.com blog - we just got rid of 10,000 blogs. For all we know, 99.9% of those may well have been in the spam zone, but again, why was it all done in one go without warning, and why was there no clear policy from the beginning? </p>
<p>Did they get a bit too wrapped up in their own hype initially?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joseph Kelly</title>
		<link>http://www.ianfernando.com/2007/10000-pissed-off-blogrush-users/#comment-1998</link>
		<dc:creator>Joseph Kelly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2007 17:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ianfernando.com/2007/10000-pissed-off-blogrush-users/#comment-1998</guid>
		<description>Here's what one problem was:

"I got to the bottom of why your blog wasnâ€™t approvedâ€¦ itâ€™s because your BlogURL was in our system as â€œlocaseoguide.comâ€ ; apparently you made a typo when creating your original account. "

I think that's hilarious! Users blame the system when it is their own fault. As a software developer, I can't stand users that get furious and start hating the company for something that they did wrong. Stop acting like a baby about BlogRush. Have some patience and investigate the matter yourself if you care so much about membership in this system. If you don't care about BlogRush, stop hating.

Wah wah.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s what one problem was:</p>
<p>&#8220;I got to the bottom of why your blog wasnâ€™t approvedâ€¦ itâ€™s because your BlogURL was in our system as â€œlocaseoguide.comâ€ ; apparently you made a typo when creating your original account. &#8221;</p>
<p>I think that&#8217;s hilarious! Users blame the system when it is their own fault. As a software developer, I can&#8217;t stand users that get furious and start hating the company for something that they did wrong. Stop acting like a baby about BlogRush. Have some patience and investigate the matter yourself if you care so much about membership in this system. If you don&#8217;t care about BlogRush, stop hating.</p>
<p>Wah wah.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Desty</title>
		<link>http://www.ianfernando.com/2007/10000-pissed-off-blogrush-users/#comment-1997</link>
		<dc:creator>Desty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2007 17:15:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ianfernando.com/2007/10000-pissed-off-blogrush-users/#comment-1997</guid>
		<description>I use it, I got approved, I look at it on others' sites.  Does it bring a flood of traffic.  No.  Does it bring traffic?  Yes.

Unless it seriously messes up, I"ll continue to use Blogrush.  Then again, I used to put other blogs' RSS feeds in my sidebars so readers could see what else is going on out there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I use it, I got approved, I look at it on others&#8217; sites.  Does it bring a flood of traffic.  No.  Does it bring traffic?  Yes.</p>
<p>Unless it seriously messes up, I&#8221;ll continue to use Blogrush.  Then again, I used to put other blogs&#8217; RSS feeds in my sidebars so readers could see what else is going on out there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
