Comments on: Load Time is Whack: Are Gurus Whacker? http://www.ianfernando.com/2007/load-time-is-whack-are-gurus-whacker/ Affiliate, Entrepreneur, Traveler, Pimp Fri, 10 Feb 2012 15:53:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Wes Mahler http://www.ianfernando.com/2007/load-time-is-whack-are-gurus-whacker/#comment-2718 Wes Mahler Sat, 26 Jan 2008 04:28:38 +0000 http://www.ianfernando.com/2007/load-time-is-whack-are-gurus-whacker/#comment-2718 Ian, I just posted that last comment, it took like 30 seconds! Ian, I just posted that last comment, it took like 30 seconds!

]]> By: Wes Mahler http://www.ianfernando.com/2007/load-time-is-whack-are-gurus-whacker/#comment-2717 Wes Mahler Sat, 26 Jan 2008 04:28:19 +0000 http://www.ianfernando.com/2007/load-time-is-whack-are-gurus-whacker/#comment-2717 Heres an interesting thing I found out, on optimizing. One big image, loads faster than alot of small images, even if the total sum of the small images is less. It takes alot more time to loadup each individual one. It looks like u ahve alot of things, little things, loading and they all add up. like if u transfer a 1mb file on ur comp it'll be fast. but if u transfer 200 small files that are 1mb its gonna be alot slower, because it does each one. one at a time. Heres an interesting thing I found out, on optimizing.

One big image, loads faster than alot of small images, even if the total sum of the small images is less. It takes alot more time to loadup each individual one.

It looks like u ahve alot of things, little things, loading and they all add up.

like if u transfer a 1mb file on ur comp it’ll be fast. but if u transfer 200 small files that are 1mb its gonna be alot slower, because it does each one. one at a time.

]]>