English flagChinese (Simplified) flagDutch flagFrench flagGerman flagGreek flagItalian flagJapanese flagKorean flagPortuguese flagRussian flagSpanish flag
By N2H

Reasons Why NOT to FAKE your Feedburner Count

September 12, 2007 · Print Post · Bookmark post

It is interesting to see how readers will just fake stats/numbers to get some traffic or subscribers. A blog that has trackbacked to me, gets a free unique visit from me. Why? I want to see what they wrote about my blog, content, or about me. I was curios. So I went to the blog and looked at the post. (I usually always visit blogs that track back to me) In the bottom right hand corner of my Firefox browser Alexa showed me a website ranking of ‘no data’. If you do not know what I am talking about here are 2 screen shots of Alexa’s new Sparky Plugin:

When I looked at his webpage’s Alexa rankings with ‘no data’ and saw he has 226 RSS subscribers. I was saying to my self “NO WAY!” How is he getting that much RSS subscribers with no traffic, poor layout structure (I am a web designer), short posts, useless content/videos, etc! I as a person and marketer wanted to find out so I simply ‘right click’ and chose view source. I thought he might of Photoshop the image somehow. To my attention the blogger was using someone else’s stats! The stats are from another country as well! (I visited the RSS link, and saw it was in another language)

I thought to myself why would someone want to just false their stats to look like they are important? Marketers/Bloggers/Authors like me will be come curious and will research! This will definitely kill your brand. After I saw the false information, I just left the site.

How Users are Adjusting their Feed Stats

It is pretty simple. They simply change the image source to someone else’s’ feedburner’s feed address. For example my FeedBurner’s Feed Address is failurestosuccess (http://feeds.ianfernando.com/failurestosuccess). If I wanted to show off someone else’s feed status I would just take their feed address and replace it with mine in the image source.

Here is how the image source code looks like:

<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/%7Efc/REPLACEFEED
?bg=000000&fg=ffffff&anim=0"
style="margin: 35px auto 0pt 0px;"
alt="" height="26" width="88">

Where it says, REPLACE FEED is where you would replace your feed address with someone elses feedburner’s address with high feed count.

BUT WHY WOULD YOU DO THIS!

I do not know why anyone would do this; this is telling your readers you are not doing it for the fact of providing good quality content but for the mere show off. So I say the bloggers that are faking the numbers of readers are trying to just gain more, but just trickery.

The only reason I see this happening is if beginners want to gain a buzz right away, by simply showing off a high number of readers which would make others think to do the same.

The Net Business Blog says you can easily copy TechCrunch RSS subscribers, by simply changing the code stated above.

Showing a larger subscriber count than what your blog has naturally makes your site seem more popular which unfortunately makes new visitors more likely to stick. Just as having a blog with “No Comments” written all over it, showing a FeedBurner chiclet with no subscribers can be just as bad. It turns people away in many cases.

On top of that it’s a great way to stroke your own ego.

AskShane.com did an experiment on this issue to see if more readers would join his feed if he faked his feed count. His conclusion:

What I found really surprised me. Over the next few days, my traffic was consistent with the days before it, but so was the subscription rate. Advertising a huge subscriber base apparently had absolutely zero effect on how likely new visitors were to subscribe.

Since Shane did this experiment and found no changes I do not think it is a good idea to adjust your feed burner count. I was actually surprise that someone would do this, I have read from prior blogs that this is a good way to attract, but I just simply turned my head. I do not want to be labeled as a fake on the internet.

Reason Why NOT to FAKE your Feedburner Count

  1. You look like a fool if someone finds out, as I have did with this particular blog.
  2. You lose credibility if someone does find out and exposes you.
  3. It just looks odd if you do not have good content and no stats
  4. It will not attract readers if you content is trash
  5. Do not let your blog/website be a numbers game (to an extent)

There maybe more reasons if there is let us all know below. I do not think this is a healthy way to attract more readers and more subscribers. Once they find out your content is not of high quality then they will simply unsubscribe. So to me this short term use, if it is, is really pointless.

I do not recommend on doing this at all, you will just loose your credibility later on.

Reactions to this Post

14 Responses to “Reasons Why NOT to FAKE your Feedburner Count”

  1. Mighty Blogger - Today’s Top Blog Posts on Blogging - Powered by SocialRank
  2. How to tell if someone is faking their Feedburner count


  1. MyAvatars 0.2 Slevi
    September 12th, 2007 10:59 am

    Valid points, except for the cause of checking it out I’d say. Having 200 subscribers with no alexa rank would be less uncommon than you think since alexa is only tracked by having people drop by which actually have an alexa plugin installed.

    The usage of that is low, that’s also the reason why an average of 7~8 unique viewers a day with an alexa plugin would already bring your score to about 50.000, the 2000 other unique visitors simply aren’t counted along at all making alexa one of the poorest tracking systems.

    If you’d be having a local bingo blog in example with all of your friendly local senior friends subscribed you’d have an audience which could tick up in subscriber numbers without gaining anything at all in the alexa rank.

    A nice example of highly visited sites as well with low alexa scores are a lot of university portals, in example for my university it has an alexa score of about 70.000 with 5 unique viewers a day on average according to alexa, that’s a figure out of over 10.000 students and a lot of staff employees as well, making about just 1 in 3000 unique people counted.

    Go to your average web developer blog though with just a small userbase and chances are high they’ll have an alexa rank of around 20.000.

    Now which would be more likely to have 2000 subscribers, don’t let Alexa fool you either ;).

  2. MyAvatars 0.2 Ian
    September 12th, 2007 12:06 pm

    > Slevi
    ahh your right - user do need the Alexa bar - but it was just fishy to me that a marketing site or make money online site had no ranking

    thanks for your info! :)

  3. MyAvatars 0.2 Snowboardjohn
    September 12th, 2007 10:56 pm

    As Slevi says, the Alexa data is useless.

    I had one site in a heavily female market which received over 2000 uniques a day (from Adwords) and it had an Alexa rank of 2 million.

  4. MyAvatars 0.2 Jayne
    September 13th, 2007 3:53 pm

    I think the biggest reason not to fake your feedburner count is because it’s lame and you’ll look like a jackass when you get caught.

    I really hope feedburner develops a cheat-proof widget.. otherwise that little graphic is worthless.

  5. MyAvatars 0.2 A. Marques
    September 13th, 2007 8:15 pm

    As Jayne said, if there is no cheat-proof mechanism, although maybe not worthless, the image doesn’t say much.
    I was surprised some time ago to find out that anyone would do this. Then I started looking at this more carefully when some site looked suspicious, and the truth is there are many bloggers out there using this trick.

    Don’t know if it’s worth it or not, but getting caught doing it can really damage your brand.

  6. MyAvatars 0.2 Ian
    September 14th, 2007 9:30 am

    > Marques & Jayne
    yes you do look like a fool if you fake it and someone that is curious will find out about it. I personally do not think it is worth it, you are providing information, which is useless but have XXXX amount of RSS subscribers - hmm looks a little strange don’t you think

  7. MyAvatars 0.2 A. Marques
    September 14th, 2007 9:37 am

    And besides, if it is like you quoted from AskShane.com, I can’t see any reason at all why anyone would do it. Of course that I don’t know how Shane did his little experiment, but even so, not worth it.

  8. MyAvatars 0.2 Slevi
    September 14th, 2007 11:29 am

    AskShane.com’s example though is just a single example, perhaps it didn’t work for him but it might actually work for others. If he already had a solid subscriber base in example the difference probably would be minimal, but if you’re on pretty much nothing there’s not many people which would subscribe to a feed with 0 people.

    It’s sort of the same trick as people commenting to their own blog with different names or asking friends to comment on their blog just to get some comments there on the latest entries, the reason? Many people for some reason are afraid to show their opinion in a comment, it’s just a minor portion which actually does comment. It shows quite well on the bigger blogs which every now and then make a post just to ask for comments and rather than the usual 30~50 comments on a post they suddenly get 200+ comments because by asking this certain border got lifted.

    Showing a low number and especially for 0 is a border pretty much like that for many, if that is something which bothers you it becomes more understandable that one would take desperate measures to try and get a start.

  9. MyAvatars 0.2 Thomas Sinfield
    September 17th, 2007 4:43 pm

    I wouldn’t fake my feed stats - too risky!
    I show my true stats, even though I only have a feed count of 14, because it allows visitors and regulars to see the growth, as I have gained those 14 in just over a week.

  10. MyAvatars 0.2 TDavid
    September 18th, 2007 1:32 pm

    Unfortunately it doesn’t negatively impact everybody who does this. Mashable was caught faking theirs and it didn’t damage their popularity at all :(

  11. MyAvatars 0.2 Nico
    May 4th, 2008 2:48 pm

    Such a great post! Very informative and well documented with plenty of examples. This is the stuff I like!

    I saw a similar blog recentely about medical equipment (obviously set up for adsense) at blogspot with no alexa stats and 300 subscribers. I was like, no way… How’s this possible?

    I thought this person must’ve made like 300 email adresses just to make it’s blog appear popular. You’re explenation probably is more logical.

    In my opinion, If your feed subscriber count is low just don’t put a chicklet up! That’s what I do on my blog.

    Either way,.. reading about feedburner seems to trigger the subscribe reflex with me because that’s what I’m doing here right now.

    Greetings,

    Nico

  12. MyAvatars 0.2 Enfotainer
    July 4th, 2008 1:06 am

    Hmm…I guess then I’ll remove the 11 subscriber stats shown in the my site feeds.

    Do you really think people will be more likely “not” to subscribe when they sees just 11 subscribers?

    Thanks,
    Mnix

Got something to say? Click Here to Say something then!

What you got to say?